In Wednesday’s New York Times dining section, someone thought
it would be a riot to take the decapitated,
amputated, defeathered corpse of a chicken and prop the body up in a sexually
suggestive “come hither” pose, plucked crotch and all.

PETA President Ingrid E. Newkirk was
not amused. “When I saw it, I just couldn’t believe that an editor of The
New York Times
would find it acceptable,” she told The Atlantic Wire. “It’s downright offensive,
not just to people who care about animals but to anyone. It’s a plucked,
beheaded, young chicken …. [That’s] necrophilia. It’s not amusing. It’s just ghastly
and sickly.”


Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Some have suggested that PETA, which has never
shied away from using nudity to make a point, is in no position to cast stones.
Excuse me? A key difference between PETA’s ads and the New York Times‘ photo is that our models are willing participants who
are still very much alive
.

Is it a sign of how desensitized our society has
become to the animals who are violently slaughtered for food that someone would
think it a “sexy” joke to pose a young chicken—a baby, really, as chickens are slaughtered at 6 to 8 weeks old—like the
star of a lingerie commercial. But picture in this bird’s place
the decapitated, amputated, skinned corpse of a puppy or a kitten. Would
anybody be laughing—or licking their chops? Doubt it.

 

What do you think of the New York Times’ sexually suggestive chicken photo?

 

 

Written by Alisa Mullins

GD Star Rating
loading...

Article source: PETA Files

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.